|
 |
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 6520G IGP
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
compute units Discrete cores within the GPU
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
| GPU brand | AMD |
|---|---|
| GPU name | BeaverCreek |
| Clock speed | 400 MHz |
| Is dual GPU | No |
| Reference card | None |
noise and power
| TDP | 35W |
|---|
raw performance
| Shading units | 320 |
|---|---|
| Texture mapping units | 16 |
| Render output processors | 8 |
| Compute units | 4 |
| Pixel rate | 3.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 6.4 GTexel/s |
| Floating-point performance | 256 GFLOPS |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 9400
|
 | ASUS Radeon HD 3850
|
 | IGP Radeon HD 6620G IGP
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
|
 | AMD Radeon R5 M330
|
 | AMD Radeon HD 6470M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 9800
|
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
