Radeon HD 8670 

Released January, 2013
  • 1 GHz
  • 2 GB GDDR5

As we saw in our Iris Pro review, Hawell's tessellation performance is surprisingly good.
by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)
At the high end, Richland maintains a 17 - 50% GPU performance advantage (~30% on average) over Intel's HD 4600 (Haswell GT2).
by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)

Benchmarks Real world tests of the Radeon HD 8670

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Radeon HD 8670
2,700
Radeon R9 380
31,844

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

Radeon HD 8670
10,190
Radeon R9 380
31,181
Radeon R7 250
10,708

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

Radeon HD 8670
10,760
Radeon R7 250
16,215
Radeon R9 380
12,191

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon HD 8670
19.25

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon HD 8670
167.9
Radeon R9 380
353.35
Radeon R7 250
148.71

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon HD 8670
13.48

In The News From around the web

Richland is approaching 60 fps in our Sleeping Dogs benchmark at medium quality, definitely not bad at all.
I never spent a ton of time testing memory overclocking with Trinity, but my A10-5800K sample had no issues running at DDR3-2133 either.

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

GPU brand AMD
GPU name Oland XT
Market Desktop
Clock speed 1,000 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz
Is dual GPU No
Reference card None

raw performance

Shading units 384
Texture mapping units 24
Render output processors 8
Compute units 6
Pixel rate 8.4 GPixel/s
Texture rate 25.2 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 806.4 GFLOPS

memory

Memory clock speed 1,150 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 4,600 MHz
Memory bus 128 bit
Memory 2,048 MB
Memory type GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 73.6 GB/s

noise and power

TDP 75W
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus