Radeon R9 295X2 

Released April, 2014
  • 1 GHz
  • 8 GB GDDR5
8 Out of 10

GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Radeon R9 295X2 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Radeon R9 295X2
n.d.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
7.1
GeForce GTX 980
7.8
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon R9 295X2
9.2
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
7.2
GeForce GTX 980
8.7
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Radeon R9 295X2
8.1
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
7.7
GeForce GTX 980
n.d.
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon R9 295X2
6.7
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
6.5
GeForce GTX 980
8.8
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Radeon R9 295X2
n.d.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
n.d.
GeForce GTX 980
7.9
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

Radeon R9 295X2
5.7
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
6.8
GeForce GTX 980
8.7
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
8

Overall Score

Radeon R9 295X2
8.0
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
6.8
GeForce GTX 980
8.2

Benchmarks Real world tests of the Radeon R9 295X2

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 295X2
614.07 mHash/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
332.46 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 980
n.d.

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 295X2
116.41 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
79.68 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 980
n.d.

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 295X2
1,997.66 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
1,933.42 frames/s
GeForce GTX 980
n.d.

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 295X2
651.4 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
844.6 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 980
n.d.

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 295X2
10.68 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
7.65 frames/s
GeForce GTX 980
n.d.

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R9 295X2
89.78
GeForce GTX 980
76.57
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
85.37

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R9 295X2
497.21
GeForce GTX 980
434.58
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
485.55

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R9 295X2
24.18
GeForce GTX 980
22.51
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
24.93

Reviews Word on the street for the Radeon R9 295X2

8.6
read review

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

GPU brand AMD
GPU name Vesuvius
Market Desktop
Clock speed 1,018 MHz
Is dual GPU Yes
Reference card AMD Radeon R9 295X2 1 GHz 8 GB

raw performance

Shading units 5,632
Texture mapping units 352
Render output processors 128
Compute units 88
Pixel rate 130.4 GPixel/s
Texture rate 358.4 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 11,466 GFLOPS

memory

Memory clock speed 1,250 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz
Memory bus 1,024 bit
Memory 8,192 MB
Memory type GDDR5

noise and power

TDP 500W
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 11 comments.
Argos (03:25 AM, May 15, 2015)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvDQzYhP05k
Hawk (09:31 AM, February 22, 2015)
Try the test also with Open GL & CL .. that did directx.. which is bias to nvidia.. I can't believe they even posted this crap.. I won't be back to this shit site again that for sure...
Hawk (09:29 AM, February 22, 2015)
What a bunch of bullshit...
Lau Jun Liang (03:08 PM, January 8, 2015)
Or maybe a tie XD
Lau Jun Liang (02:55 PM, January 8, 2015)
Well yes. =/ People even spread rumors that the titan Z is stronger than R9295X. But sadly it takes two sli gtx 980 to beat this beast.
guest (02:04 AM, January 8, 2015)
you have to admit, it is suspicious that almost all nvidia card are rated above amd card equivalents...
Farhan (10:14 AM, January 5, 2015)
Shut up. you dont know anything about 4K resolutions or dual-card GPUs
cpvalence (03:05 AM, August 8, 2014)
Double the Passmark result of the 295x2 and the comparison should be more accurate.
Lau Jun Liang (02:56 PM, July 3, 2014)
This card is lunatic with a lunatic price. 4k in 60 fps. But I have no idea why this card is said here to be weaker than the gtx 780?????? Is this a bias website????
Guest (02:54 PM, July 3, 2014)
This card is lunatic with lunatic price. runs at 4k with 60 avg fps.
cpvalence (01:21 AM, June 6, 2014)
By the time we get some results, we only have half of them. Passmark only tested one part of the dual GPU Beast. Time will show us if we can get some benchmarks with "a bit" more accuracy.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss