|
| 7.1 Out of 10 |  |
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2015)4K gaming is something that AMD says is the best on the Fury X, thanks to it being "fueled by a 4096-bit high-bandwidth memory interface for extreme performance and power efficiency.
by Anthony-Garreffa (Sep, 2015)It's the best demonstration of High Bandwidth Memory and its far-reaching benefits, too.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Radeon R9 M290X among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Radeon R9 M290X
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Thief
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
In The News From around the web
| 7 Nov |
|
GPU Clock: Up to 1000 – 1100 MHz (exact number not known).
Memory Clock: 5500 – 6000 MHz (exact number not known).
| 2 Oct |
|
No, no you wouldn't because the 4GB framebuffer is simply not enough for anything above 4K right now, which is why we see a few of AMD's marketing pushes for the Fury X using medium detail in some games, as it greatly reduces the amount of framebuffer required.
I'm an enthusiast who loves 60FPS+ gaming, anything below this isn't good enough.
| 16 Sep |
|
We have definitely enjoyed having smaller enthusiast video cards in all of the Fiji-powered cards, the R9 Nano, R9 Fury, and R9 Fury X. The R9 Nano in particular is an amazing achievement for AMD - price and issues aside.
Starting off with the Heaven results at 4K without AA enabled, the scaling between 1, 2, 3 and 4 GPUs is actually quite good.
| 10 Sep |
|
Starting with 3DMark at 1080p, we see that the R9 Nano falls right into this spot, where it is 9% faster than the overclocked R9 390X, and 13% slower than the Fury X. Increasing up to the 1440p run of 3DMark, the R9 Nano is 14% slower than the Fury X, while at 4K it is 16% slower.
Starting with Battlefield 4, the R9 Nano is more than capable of delivering an awesome gaming experience with an average of 91FPS.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
| GPU brand | AMD |
|---|---|
| GPU name | Neptune |
| Market | Laptop |
| Clock speed | 850 MHz |
| Turbo clock speed | 900 MHz |
| Is dual GPU | No |
| Reference card | None |
raw performance
| Shading units | 1,280 |
|---|---|
| Texture mapping units | 80 |
| Render output processors | 32 |
| Compute units | 20 |
| Pixel rate | 28.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 72 GTexel/s |
| Floating-point performance | 2,304 GFLOPS |
memory
| Memory clock speed | 1,200 MHz |
|---|---|
| Effective memory clock speed | 4,800 MHz |
| Memory bus | 256 bit |
| Memory | 4,096 MB |
| Memory type | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s |
noise and power
| TDP | 100W |
|---|
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
|
 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 870M
|
 | AMD Radeon HD 8970M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M
|
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
