Radeon R9 M295X 

Released November, 2014
  • 723 MHz
  • 4 GB GDDR5
7.7 Out of 10

4K gaming is something that AMD says is the best on the Fury X, thanks to it being "fueled by a 4096-bit high-bandwidth memory interface for extreme performance and power efficiency.
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2015)
It's the best demonstration of High Bandwidth Memory and its far-reaching benefits, too.
by Anthony-Garreffa (Sep, 2015)

Benchmarks Real world tests of the Radeon R9 M295X

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M295X
391.88 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 880M
82.51 mHash/s
Radeon R9 M290X
258.05 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M295X
65.78 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 880M
41.2 mPixels/s
Radeon R9 M290X
54.52 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M295X
1,429.52 frames/s
Radeon R9 M290X
1,134.46 frames/s
GeForce GTX 880M
1,215.86 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M295X
495.87 mInteraction/s
Radeon R9 M290X
350.88 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 880M
384.1 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M290X


Radeon R9 M295X

Battlefield 4

Radeon R9 M295X

Bioshock Infinite

Radeon R9 M295X

In The News From around the web


Report: AMD Radeon R9 380X Coming November 15 for $249

by Sebastian Peak |
GPU Clock: Up to 1000 – 1100 MHz (exact number not known).
Memory Clock: 5500 – 6000 MHz (exact number not known).
No, no you wouldn't because the 4GB framebuffer is simply not enough for anything above 4K right now, which is why we see a few of AMD's marketing pushes for the Fury X using medium detail in some games, as it greatly reduces the amount of framebuffer required.
I'm an enthusiast who loves 60FPS+ gaming, anything below this isn't good enough.
We have definitely enjoyed having smaller enthusiast video cards in all of the Fiji-powered cards, the R9 Nano, R9 Fury, and R9 Fury X. The R9 Nano in particular is an amazing achievement for AMD - price and issues aside.
Starting off with the Heaven results at 4K without AA enabled, the scaling between 1, 2, 3 and 4 GPUs is actually quite good.
Starting with 3DMark at 1080p, we see that the R9 Nano falls right into this spot, where it is 9% faster than the overclocked R9 390X, and 13% slower than the Fury X. Increasing up to the 1440p run of 3DMark, the R9 Nano is 14% slower than the Fury X, while at 4K it is 16% slower.
Starting with Battlefield 4, the R9 Nano is more than capable of delivering an awesome gaming experience with an average of 91FPS.

Specifications Full list of technical specs


GPU brand AMD
GPU name Amethyst
Market Laptop
Clock speed 723 MHz
Is dual GPU No
Reference card None

raw performance

Shading units 2,048
Texture mapping units 128
Render output processors 32
Compute units 32
Pixel rate 23.14 GPixel/s
Texture rate 92.5 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 2,961.4 GFLOPS


Memory clock speed 1,250 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz
Memory bus 256 bit
Memory 4,096 MB
Memory type GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s

noise and power

TDP 250W
Report a correction


comments powered by Disqus