Radeon R9 M360 

When it comes to building and configuring Core M, Intel likes to refer to their efforts as the “Fanless Challenge,” reflecting the fact that their biggest goal with Core M is to comfortably get the processor in to 10” tablets under 10mm in thickness that are passively cooled.

The end result no doubt limited what performance optimizations Intel could integrate into Broadwell’s design, but it also functionally reduces power requirements for any given performance level, furthering Intel’s goals in getting Core performance in a mobile device.

The recent launch of Intel’s Devil’s Canyon processors which boast 4.4 GHz clock speed and the efficient Haswell microarchitecture which allows up to 5 GHz overclock of air cooling might have led AMD to relaunch their own 5 GHz processors which were introduced a year ago but failed to drag the same kind of attention as Intel CPUs do probably due to the failure to match expectation during the Bulldozer and Piledriver era.

Many people might have expected a new launch from AMD around the high-performance x86 segment but as AMD has stated several times before, they are currently focusing their efforts on the APU front since it has been more profitable for the restructuring company.

Now that it is out, multiple sources are claiming the vendor-supplied benchmarks are exaggerated or simply untrue.

Ironically, the launch of the Radeon R9 295 X2 video card might have lessened that number of benchmarks available for NVIDIA's driver, who knows?

Nvidia’s Tegra is moving up in the Graphics World at an incredible pace, with Tegra 5 employing a Mobile Variant of the Kepler Architecture, the mobile graphics solution is quickly growing to rival current day graphics.

Even though why they would be pursuing 64 Bit when our current mobiles never support more than 2 GB of Ram (64 Bit is needed for 4 GB +) is beyond us.