Radeon R9 M395X 

Released May, 2015
  • 723 MHz
  • 8 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10

Its desktop equivalent which is likely to use the Radeon R9 275X branding will feature the same GPU with better clock speeds.
by hassan-mujtaba (Jun, 2014)
No, the games won’t look the absolute best they can, but they’ll still look fine — and play well.
by Matthew-Murray (Sep, 2011)

GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Radeon R9 M395X among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Radeon R9 M395X
n.d.
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon R9 M395X
8.1
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Radeon R9 M395X
7.0
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon R9 M395X
5.1
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Radeon R9 M395X
n.d.
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

Radeon R9 M395X
5.0
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Radeon R9 M395X
6.9

Benchmarks Real world tests of the Radeon R9 M395X

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
331.78 mHash/s
Radeon R9 M390X
241.48 mHash/s
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
321.77 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
55.72 mPixels/s
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
71.78 mPixels/s
Radeon R9 M390X
42.73 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
769.95 frames/s
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
1,285.14 frames/s
Radeon R9 M390X
836.7 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
313.12 mInteraction/s
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
409.67 mInteraction/s
Radeon R9 M390X
313.31 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
4.82 frames/s
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
5.84 frames/s
Radeon R9 M390X
4.03 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
62 frames/s
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
75.35 frames/s
Radeon R9 M390X
65.67 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
3,356.92

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
2,913.6

In The News From around the web

The experience was smooth though of course there were no indications of frame rate, etc. while it was going on.
Its desktop equivalent which is likely to use the Radeon R9 275X branding will feature the same GPU with better clock speeds.
Though the mainstream note-books featuring the GeForce GTX 860M and 850M Maxwell cores will still look like a better power efficient offering.
And so far, AMD’s lack of GPUs was associated solely to the excess of GPU Miners (Litecoin miners mostly) buying out all the mid – high end Radeons.
But it appears that if AMD could somehow solve the lack of “raw materials” issue, Radeons would be available at reasonable prices once again.
Each class will get one product update for now, the R9 M290X will be the flagship chip replacing the HD 8970M.
The R7 M265 would be a rebrand too with 384 Stream processors and a max clock speed of 850 – 900 MHz and a memory frequency of 1125 MHz with 2 GB GDDR5 buffer.

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

GPU brand AMD
GPU name Amethyst
Market Laptop
Clock speed 723 MHz
Is dual GPU No
Reference card None

raw performance

Shading units 2,048
Texture mapping units 128
Render output processors 32
Compute units 32
Pixel rate 23.14 GPixel/s
Texture rate 92.5 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 2,961.4 GFLOPS

memory

Memory clock speed 1,250 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz
Memory bus 256 bit
Memory 8,192 MB
Memory type GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s

noise and power

TDP 250W
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 9 comments.
And it is true that with each generation amd and nvidia tend to take turns so to speak at being the"graphics king" and it appears the same with amd's fx cpus
i hope all three companies stay running because otherwise theirs no competition, without the competition the hardware would advance painfully slow and the games would suffer immensely especially graphics wise
elaborate
****This is unacceptable in mobile computing as more Watts means the fans spin more and become an annoyance to those w/o are around w/o headphones**** That is enough for me to understand that you are the typical non-educated fanboy
Usually AMD comes out ahead then NVidia falls behind then NVidia comes ahead. I wonder what would happen when AMD doesn't exist and Intel and NVidia have full monopoly. Either they keep the rate the same, take 2+ years to release anything better, or release 2-4x faster. I'm sure there could be geniuses that could save the company but because of the whole inner circle mentality the world has.. I probably doubt.
they will go bankrupt. I hope not, but this is reality. Hope they ll do magic with the new architecture incoming.
I read somewhere it's 125W.. 980M goes 100W and 970M goes 81W and it's still way faster This is unacceptable in mobile computing as more Watts means the fans spin more and become an annoyance to those w/o are around w/o headphones. It also increases thermals which degrade the laptop even faster and it eats more battery life. For desktop gaming AMD can get away with tricking people with jacking up power requirements to keep up with the competition but for mobile use it's.. really unacceptable.
Not A bit. this is BULLSHIT
250w TDP? That's a bit high for a 15" Alienware laptop..
comments powered by Disqus