Radeon RX 460 

Released August, 2016
  • 1.1 GHz
  • 2 GB GDDR5
6.8 Out of 10

Explore 9 desktops with the Radeon RX 460
Performance (overclocking, power)80%Quality (build, design, cooling)80%General Features (display outputs, etc)80%Bundle, Packaging & Software80%Value for Money90% Overall TweakTown Rating82% The Bottom Line: SAPPHIRE's new Nitro Radeon RX 460 4GB is priced at just $139, nailing the 1080p gaming scene.
by www.tweaktown.com (Aug, 2016)
In the world of today's gaming PCs, 1080p 30FPS is a really nice stride to hit at Ultra detail in some of today's games.
by www.tweaktown.com (Aug, 2016)

GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Radeon RX 460 among Desktop GPUs


Radeon RX 460
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


Radeon RX 460
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Radeon RX 460
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon RX 460
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Radeon RX 460
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

Radeon RX 460
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Radeon RX 460

Benchmarks Real world tests of the Radeon RX 460

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 460
236.78 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
173.22 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 950
234.94 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 460
55 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 950
77.13 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
44.94 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 460
GeForce GTX 950

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 460
GeForce GTX 950

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon RX 460

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon RX 460

Battlefield 4

Radeon RX 460

Bioshock Infinite

Radeon RX 460

In The News From around the web

Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooled Edition = SEXY: You've got to give it to AMD... they have made one of the best, if not the best reference graphics card ever.
FreeSync + Radeon = Great Value: If you're a new PC gamer, then Radeon RX Vega 56 is a good - but not great value for money graphics card.
Polaris was destined to be the new mid-range champion, and it became that - but not without multiple problems along the way.
NVIDIA continued pummel AMD with the push of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti, and then AMD began teasing its Polaris GPU architecture - months after the company spun off its GPU division into Radeon Technologies Group.
It's also an incredibly confusing naming scheme that NVIDIA has adopted, but before I get into that - let's look at NVIDIA's previous TITAN X graphics cards, and their official (and unofficial) names.
AMD will thump down its new Vega architecture with a truly next-gen series of graphics cards in the Radeon RX Vega family, led by HBM2 and HBC technologies.

ASUS Adds Radeon RX 470 and RX 460 to ROG STRIX Gaming Lineup

by Sebastian Peak |
The RX 470 is certainly a capable gaming option as it's a slightly cut-down version of the RX 480 GPU, and with the two versions of the STRIX Gaming cards offering varying levels of overclocking, they can come even closer to the performance of a stock RX 480.
ASUS announced the Radeon RX 470 STRIX Gaming cards last week, and today the more affordable RX 460 GPU variant has been announced.

Specifications Full list of technical specs


GPU brand AMD
GPU name Baffin
Market Desktop
Clock speed 1,090 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz
Is dual GPU No
Reference card None

raw performance

Shading units 896
Texture mapping units 56
Render output processors 16
Compute units 14
Pixel rate 19.2 GPixel/s
Texture rate 67.2 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 2,150.4 GFLOPS


Memory clock speed 1,750 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz
Memory bus 128 bit
Memory 2,048 MB
Memory type GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 112 GB/s

noise and power

Report a correction


Showing 8 comments.
This radeon very nice
Ok, Kinda makes sense but false leading really.
I don't know, maybe I had not used the 1050 or the value from it was correct. The problem is not "is this better/worse as this", the problem is that the values for the comparison are different from the original, while they have their correct values when compared with something else.
was referring to for comparison against the 460
I agree. The charts are whack.
not the same category
where the 1050?
Why the fucking hell has the GTX 950 and GTX 750 Ti other values when compare it with the GIGABYTE Radeon RX 460 4 GB? At all other they only have 7.2 ! That shit makes no sense !
comments powered by Disqus